We’re at this place here in Seattle where summer bestows upon winter a confused, wet kiss.  Fall is born and residents don’t know whether to don fleece, shorts, or some combination of the two.  On one sidewalk, ear-muffs and flip flops co-exist amongst the decoration of fallen leaves.  I love this change, this confusion, when rain doesn’t always equate cold and when the sun does not always chase away the chill.

Growing up in a place like San Diego where a rainy day has somehow become “tweet-worthy,” this refreshing chill of autumn, is welcomed.  Shuffling through water-matted leaves clinging to the city’s sidewalks under grey skies is oddly cathartic.

It feels as if the weather, as if the region, is helping to bear my burdens.  The pacific northwest itself is lending its understanding and even advice to my emotional state.  The past few months have been interesting, to say the least.  And in hearing the wind’s perplexing songs and seeing the ruffled brow of the clouds, I am led to believe that autumn knows.  Or maybe it’s God who knows.  Or both.

I began working in stem cell transplant as a physician assistant in the beginning of February.  I work with the actual patients going through the process.  We treat complications, infections, regimen related toxicities, etc. Our primary patient population possess hematologic malignancies (leukemias and lymphomas).  While our researchers are tremendously brilliant, I imagine it might be somewhat easier (at least emotionally) to remain on that side of transplant.  You can remain detached.  Deaths can remain face-less numbers.  Holding the hands of those mourning remains on the inside of the building up the street.

Ironically, these faces and stories are what originally attracted me to oncology in the first place.  On cover letters and in interviews, I stated, “I want to help people, to be there for individuals who are going through their most difficult moments.”  This is still true.  I just did not realize how difficult it would be.

“How can there be laughter,

How can there be pleasure,

When the whole world

Is burning?

When you

Are deep in darkness,

Will you not ask for a lamp?
”

-The Dhammapada

How can I not feel what they feel?  How can a small part of me not die each time they suffer, each time another patient passes?

In PA school, we had a lecturer named Kathleen who did the majority of our hematology/oncology lectures.  She was amazing.  There is not one person in my class who was not somehow inspired by her.  She somehow balanced on this tightrope of daily giving of herself, maintaining openness and empathy alongside of an ability to, at least partially, compartmentalize in not taking every difficult case home with her.

I have not yet learned how to do this.

Either I flip some internal switch within myself to allow for emotional distance or I end up crying in the bathroom on a semi-regular basis (though it seems that I suffer from the latter more often than the former).  I work with a few other providers who seemed to have perfected this delicate dance.  In asking how they do it, I have not yet found a real, concrete answer that I can actually put into practice.

I suppose it is a rather vague concept, as well as somewhat personal.  Dealing with death and tragedy isn’t really something you want to bring up at an after work happy hour.

More than fearing sadness and pain though, I fear detachment and coldness and the gradual distancing of myself.  I fear a slow extinguishment of a part of my personality, a part of my soul, that I very much treasure.

I am not alone in this.  Of this I am certain.  So, for those of us who encounter tragedy, sadness, and human suffering on a regular basis, how do we cope?  Does the answer lie in spreading the burden, in sharing these moments of sadness with those with whom we are close? Does the answer lie in prayer, casting our cares upon Him because he cares for us?

Maybe this gradual distancing is inevitable, regardless of how vigilant we are in attempting to retain our emotional availability… I would be a fool to assume that traumatic experiences do not change us in some manner. Am I a fool to hope that it will change me for the better, as opposed to turning me into a bitter and cynical old woman?

I am reading a book called Trauma Stewardship: An Everyday Guide to Caring for Self while Caring for Others. The author states something simple that really resonates with me… “Being present [in difficult circumstances] is real work.”

Until I stumble upon some very wise person who possesses the answers to each of these questions, I will continue to work on being present. I will continue to try and bring all of me to these difficult encounters, embracing the fears, disappointments and sadness of both my patients and myself.  I will try to wholly be there, offering all of myself all of the time.  I recognize this is much easier said than done.  And I pray that the changes that each of us experience, the rapidity of water moving over these stones of jagged edges, will change us for the better.

In the past 9 months, I have learned already that living becomes a much more powerful, poignant activity when death is kept in mind.  It reminds us to say the words we should, to be bold and courageous.  It prompts us to love those around us so hard, so mightily.  The idea of death instigates action now, while we can.  It is so easy to turn around and ask, where did that week go? Where did that season go? Where did that decade go?  I just don’t want to turn around and ask, “Where did that life go?”

I want to be ready.  I want to love and to care and to do now.

Before it is too late.

In so many ways, facebook is a fantastic tool.  I’ll avoid boring you by listing all of those ways in which it is beneficial, as I’m sure we each have our own individual reasons to love facebook…

As well as to loathe it.  I’ll list these thoughts for the sake of venting (even though I’m certain we all share in these annoyances):

1)             The addictive nature of it.

2)             The re-emergence of people from your past who somehow find you with whom you would rather not associate.

3)             The immediate access you have to your ex-boyfriend’s newfound happiness with a girl who is (debatably) prettier than you.

4)             But worst of all… the controversial statements meant to stir up debate, which inevitably spiral into name-calling and comments laced so thick with exaggeration that the truth remains dead and buried.

I don’t really know why this last offense bothers me so.  I suppose using facebook as a way in which to voice one’s opinions (however insightful and/or baseless they may be) is essentially the same as having a blog, right?  I’m expressing my opinions here, so why does it feel so much different on facebook?  And why (as I stated above) do these facebook “arguments” always end in below the belt remarks?

[side note: why does Microsoft Word still put the red squiggly line underneath the word “blog”? Someone needs to invite Microsoft Word to the interweb]

Maybe the crime feels more poignant because those opinions just show up in my newsfeed regardless of whether I’m requesting them or not.  They just pop up like one of those little mole-rat things you have to bop on the head in those arcade games at the Boardwalk (shout out to my peeps from East County).  Normally, I’m able to allay the temptation to bust these “mole-comments” on the head.  I bite my tongue, clamp my little typing fingers into a tight fist and navigate my way to a distraction… which is usually the pages displaying the health and happiness of ex-boyfriends.

Today, in the middle of Target, I gave in… and did some “bopping” (for lack of a better term) via my iPhone.

The statement that finally urged me to give in: “Why don’t we ever see donations for the starving, homeless, and sick kids that are USA citizens on T.V.? Shouldn’t our kids be our 1st priority??”

Seemingly valid point, right? Many people I know would readily agree with that statement.  I can see the merit in such a statement and can understand, to an extent, why some people feel that way.  That is probably why I was so bothered by it.

I think it is very easy to buy into that line of reasoning.  It makes us feel patriotic, like we are promoting some form of national justice.  It makes us feel like we pay taxes for a reason and those taxes can possibly replace philanthropy. Why give to those suffering overseas when we already give (albeit inadvertently and not by choice) to housing programs and welfare assistance and public schools…?

I would argue (and did argue on facebook in Target via my iPhone in not so many words) that:

1)  Oftentimes, the most grave of situations, the people groups who are most in need are not in the United States (ie- the famine and drought in The Horn of Africa, the earthquake in Japan, the genocide in Darfur).  Suffering exists in the United States.  I will not deny that.  And if someone wanted to give donations of money, time, or prayer to food banks, homeless shelters, rape crisis centers, battered women’s shelters or mentoring programs here in the US… well, that is great.  I would never try and dissuade someone from doing that.  Great needs exist here, but I would continue to argue that greater needs exist elsewhere.

2)  Sometimes, the problems are more treatable (excuse the medical term) elsewhere.  See Bill Frist’s piece in the WSJ (shout out to my dad who loves to send articles from the WSJ to my inbox)… http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903918104576504530889102972.html

If we’re talking strictly about monetary donation, many of the United State’s most difficult issues are tied up in political red tape and are not going to be fixed simply by throwing money at them.  Unfortunately, many problems overseas will not be fixed by throwing money at them either, but occasionally you find one that is surprisingly more easily remedied than you might initially expect. Our money will literally go further in other places at times.

3) Probably the aspect of this that infuriates me more than anything else is that we are all human beings.  If a child deserves certain treatment (be it food, medical assistance, a good education, avoidance of exploitation), he or she deserves that treatment everywhere (Texas, California, Russia, Sudan, Guatemala, etc.).  Why would we argue that our children are more deserving of humane treatment?  Is it because we see them everyday so if we are seeing well-fed, well-educated, healthy kids we feel less guilty?  I don’t know.

Those are my thoughts.  Thank you for bearing with them, however muddled they may be… I feel much better addressing these issues here as opposed to facebook.  Still not really sure why… On a positive note, I don’t think enough people actually read my blog to incite name-calling and arguments.

I figure, that’s probably a good thing.

I’m utterly transfixed by all of this 9/11 coverage, the revisiting and stories of the aftermath.  Most of the time, anything that feels “overly done” or discussed far too often in the news, annoys the crap out of me.  It usually makes me want to avoid news media of any kind.

But not so with 9/11.  There’s something about it that I find so devastating, yet so inspiring… something worthy of paradox designation.

Perhaps it is because it was the first major world event I can remember that really affected me.  They talk about these “flash bulb moments” you have.  When this phenomena was described to me in junior high school, the teacher used the example that she remembered exactly where she was and what she was doing when she heard JFK was assassinated.  The memory of receiving that knowledge will forever be etched in her mind.

I can say the same thing for 9/11.  I remember coming out of the garage of my parents’ house and walking toward my little green Escort, about to head off to school.  My normally even keeled dad, whose gait was rarely filled with immediacy, ran out of the house behind my sister and me. In a rushed flurry of words, he told us that a plane had crashed into the World Trade Center.  I didn’t know what the World Trade Center even was, but the tone of his voice and the look on his face told me this was serious.  This was big.

Flash bulb moment.

I was in 11th grade.  Instead of talking about Huck Finn in my first period English class, we watched the news coverage.  The last time I remembered doing that was to watch the results of the OJ Simpson trial in 5th grade.  But this felt far more important, no offense to Nicole Brown Simpson.

We watched some of the most graphic images I had ever seen.  People were jumping out of the buildings.  These were real people, not actors in movies who were surrounded by special effects.  It was chilling. I am sure anyone watching the news that day will tell you that you began to feel the absolute hopelessness and fear of those who were trapped.

I was just old enough to try to put myself in the shoes of those who had been through tragedy.  And though I never came close to feeling their pain, their fear, or their sorrow, I was hit so hard emotionally, much like the rest of America.  I think we all felt just a little bit of survivor’s guilt that day.

And as I have gotten older and have seen more and been exposed to different circumstances, I think I am just a little bit better able to empathize.  In watching all of this “revisiting” and “remembering” coverage for the 10 year anniversary, I’m crying.  For sure, I’m crying.  Some of the tears are for loss and for sadness.  They are for babies who were forced to grow up without moms or dads.  They are for parents who buried their children.  They are for lost potential, for senseless deaths.

Even more than loss, though, I’m overwhelmed with pride by the heroism displayed by fellow Americans.  I think this heroism is not just something to remember, though, but something to celebrate.

So, I guess that’s the purpose of this piece of writing… the celebration of heroism.  The men and women on each of those planes and in the towers who undoubtedly provided support and comfort to one another, the airline passengers who attempted to foil the goals of the terrorists, the complete selflessness of firefighters and police officers who refused to succumb to fear, and the friends and family members of lost loved ones who went on to live their lives, moving forward in the face of such painful tragedy.

Courage.

That is the common good that should band us together.  That is the inspiration that should motivate us to act and to live differently.

Not anger. Not hatred of a common enemy. And not vengeance for what has been done.

Let us never forget.  But in remembering, in preserving those “flashbulb moments” let us not only be moved, but let us change.

Tomorrow let us refuse to be motivated by fear.  Out of respect for those who are no longer able to do so, let us act, minute-by-minute, in courage.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.